Mohr
(PC) White v. Mohr
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DELCREE WHITE, JR., Case No. 2:22-cv-00834-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
13 v. PAUPERIS 14 SETH MOHR, et al., ECF No. 2 15 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 16 (1) FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, OR 18 (2) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT SUBJECT TO DISMISSAL ECF No. 1 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 22 Plaintiff Delcree White, Jr., brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendants Mohr and Heinkel used excessive force against him and wrongly caused him to spend months in administrative segregation. He provides minimal facts to support his claims and admits that he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing this suit. I will dismiss his complaint with leave to amend so that he can explain why he should be allowed to proceed…