Scnumman

(PC) Rodriguez v. Scnumman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20222:21-cv-01511California937 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIAN RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:21-cv-1511 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS B. SCNUMMAN, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner, now living in Mexico. On June 30, 2022, plaintiff was granted sixty days in which to oppose defendant’s motion to compel discovery, and cautioned that failure to oppose the motion would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to cooperate in discovery. On September 12, 2022, defendant filed a declaration attesting that plaintiff has not opposed the motion or provided discovery responses or produced documents to defendant. The court’s docket confirms that plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the motion or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed. Legal Standards “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the district court may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.