Matteson
(PC) Rogers v. Matteson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAURICE DI AUNDRA ROGERS, No. 2:22-cv-0403 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GISELLE MATTESON, et al. Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 11, 2022, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint which the court now screens. The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). Having conducted the required screening, the court finds that plaintiff may proceed on a claim arising under the First Amendment against defendant Ray…