(PS) Gastelum v. Arbor Lodging Partners, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20222:22-cv-01689California1,048 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO GASTELUM, No. 2:22–cv–1689–TLN–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING

MISJOINDER

v.

ARBOR LODGING PARTNERS LLC, et al 15 Defendants.

On September 27, 2022, plaintiff filed a fee-paid complaint initiating this action asserting 18 ADA and state disability claims against the following four defendants: 1) Arbor Lodging 19 Partners, LLC dba Piccadilly Inn; 2) HIE River Park, LLC dba Holiday Inn Express Fresno 20 Riverpark; 3) Millenium Properties, LLC dba Hampton Inn Bakersfield; and 21 4) Nihal, LLC dba Holiday Inn Express Sacramento. (See ECF No. 1.) It is unclear whether any 22 defendant has been served, as no defendant has appeared or otherwise responded. Because plaintiff’s claims against all four defendants contain sufficient factual differences, plaintiff’s claims against defendants fail to meet the permissive joinder requirements. Accordingly, the 26 27 1 Plaintiff appears without the assistance of counsel, and so this matter was referred to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.