(PC) James v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20222:21-cv-00713California741 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD EUGENE JAMES, Case No. 2:21-cv-00713-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND

v. DISCOVERY STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF THIRTY

DAYS TO RESPOND TO FILE AN

Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND HOLDING

THE JUNE 13, 2022 FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN ABEYANCE 17 18 19 On May 4, 2022, I notified plaintiff that his complaint did not state a claim and granted him thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 19. I also warned plaintiff that failure to comply with that order may result in dismissal of this action. Id. at 6. On June 13, 2022, after plaintiff failed to timely respond to that order, I recommended that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to state a claim. ECF No. 20. I notified plaintiff that any objections to that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.