(SS) Pacini v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20221:20-cv-01009California1,342 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADREANNA JOY PACINI, Case No. 1:20-cv-01009-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES1 v. (Doc. No. 22) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ORDER FOR CLERK TO MAIL A COPY OF

SECURITY, ORDER TO PLAINTIFF Defendant. 17 Monica Perales (“Counsel”) of the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, attorney for Adreanna Joy Pacini (“Plaintiff”), filed a motion seeking attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) on September 22, 2022. (Doc. No. 22). Plaintiff was served with the motion and advised she had 14 days to object. (Id. at 2, 24). Plaintiff has filed no opposition to the motion as of the date of this Order. (See docket). The Defendant filed a response in its role as a “trustee” for Plaintiff and “provided an analysis of the fee request” but “takes no position on the reasonableness of the request.” (Doc. No. 23 at 2, 5). For the reasons set forth below, the motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.