Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Blu Homes, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20222:21-cv-01543California313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE No. 2:21-cv-1543 KJM AC

COMPANY,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

BLU HOMES, INC.,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On March 22, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty one days. ECF No. 14. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.