Lattimore

(PC) Polk v. Lattimore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20221:12-cv-01156California1,400 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUSAN MAE POLK, No. 1:12-cv-01156-ADA-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING

LATTIMORE, et al., DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

Defendants. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES (ECF Nos. 147, 161) 17 Plaintiff Susan Mae Polk is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s fifth amended complaint against Defendant Baron for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment, arising from allegations that he placed a “snitch jacket” on Plaintiff by informing another inmate that Plaintiff had reported that inmate’s threats on Plaintiff’s life. On February 25, 2022, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations suggesting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.