(HC)Franklin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER FRANKLIN, Case No. 2:22-cv-00825-TLN-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES

UNKNOWN, ECF No. 25 Respondent.

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS 17 18 On August 16, 2022, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 25. To date, petitioner has not filed a response to the motion. In cases in which a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition not more than twenty-one days after the date the motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l). Failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.” Id. To manage its docket effectively, the…