Rockwell

Rockwell v. Tuolumne County, California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20221:22-cv-00392California401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALLAN THOMAS ROCKWELL, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-00392-JLT-EPG ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) RECOMMENDING THAT CLAIMS BROUGHT ) ON BEHALF OF MINOR PLAINTIFF G.A.R. TUOLUMNE COUNTY, et al., ) BE DISMISSED ) Defendants. ) (Doc. 55.) )

Allan Thomas Rockwell, proceeding pro se, initiated this action against Tuolumne County, Michael Choate, Denise Choate, and Melissa Brouhard on April 4, 2022. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint indicating that the action is brought by Plaintiff and by G.A.R., a minor. (Doc. 5.) The Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why G.A.R.’s claims should not be dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff has no authority to proceed on his behalf. (Doc. 8.) In findings and recommendations issued July 29, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge found that Plaintiff, a non-attorney proceeding pro se, does not have the authority to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.