Quick

(PC) Jackson v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20221:19-cv-01591California7,315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 CORNEL JACKSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01591-JLT-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE

GRANTED, IN PART, AND DENIED, IN PART

JASON QUICK, et al., (ECF No. 108) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Cornel Jackson is a pretrial detainee confined at the Madera County Jail and proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s claims that Defendants Jason Quick, Elizabeth Alvarez, A. Rossette, Lt. Followill, 20 Lisette Lopez, Dominic Ramos, Hermina Marley, and Carmela Prudente violated his First and 21 Sixth Amendment rights regarding his legal mail, that these Defendants engaged in a 22 conspiracy to violate those rights, and that Alvarez violated his right of access to the courts.1 23 (ECF No. 30 – order adopting September 30, 2022 findings and recommendations (ECF No. 24 26)).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.