Bibbs

(PC) Denton v. Bibbs

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20221:19-cv-00316California1,836 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND H. DENTON, Case No. 1:19-cv-00316-ADA-EPG (PC)

10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT HIS COMPLAINT BE DENIED

S. BIBB, et al.,

13 (ECF No. 75) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

15 Raymond Denton (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s claim against defendants S. Bibb,1 Lieutenant J. Anderson, Lieutenant T. Costa, and Associate Warden R. Chavez for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. (ECF Nos. 11 & 16). Plaintiff alleges that these defendants retaliated against him for filing grievances. (ECF No. 9). On October 3, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to supplement his complaint, along with the proposed supplement. (ECF No. 75). On October 7, 2022, Defendants filed an 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.