Harris

Harris v. City of Tulare

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20221:18-cv-01135California2,423 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANYKA HARRIS and BOBBY Case No. 1:18-cv-01135-JLT-SKO

REEDOM,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CERTIFY Plaintiffs, AS FRIVOLOUS INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL RE QUALIFIED IMMUNITY v. (Doc. 69) CITY OF TULARE, et al., CASE WILL REMAIN STAYED Defendant.

17 I. INTRODUCTION This is a civil rights case concerning the March 12, 2018, officer-involved shooting of Jontell Reedom (“Decedent” or “Jontell”), the son of Plaintiffs Anyka Harris and Bobby Reedom. (Doc. 1.) The shooting ultimately resulted in Jontell’s death. (Id.) This case was filed on August 22, 2018, and alleged, among other things, that City of Tulare Officers Clemente Clinton and Jose Valencia violated Decedent’s constitutional rights. (Id.) Defendants filed a motion for summary judgement on June 10, 2020. (Doc. 33.) The motion was ripe for decision as of July 2, 2020, (Doc. 40), but was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.