Newsom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KARSENE MCFADDEN, No. 2:21-cv-02411 DAD DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS GAVIN C. NEWSOME, et al., Defendants. 16 By order served on September 8, 2022, the court dismissed plaintiff’s amended complaint and granted thirty days leave to file a further amended complaint. The time period granted for filing a further amended complaint has expired and plaintiff has not filed a further amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Although plaintiff’s copy of the order served by mail was returned undelivered, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at a party’s record address is fully effective. For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These…