(PS) Fulkerson v. Nevada Attorney General's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20222:21-cv-01486California840 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HEATH V. FULKERSON, No. 2:21-cv-1486 DAD DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Heath Fulkerson is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On August 19, 2021, plaintiff filed a complaint, paid the applicable filing fee, and summons issued. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) A letter also issued that advised plaintiff that Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a defendant must be dismissed if service of the summons and complaint is not accomplished on the defendant within 90 days after the complaint was filed. (ECF No. 3.) More than 90 days passed, plaintiff took no action in this case, and the docket did not reflect proof of service on, or the appearance of, a defendant. //// //// //// Accordingly, on April 12,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.