Tanton

(PC) Campbell v. Tanton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20222:18-cv-00671California7,890 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SENARBLE CAMPBELL, No. 2:18-cv-00671-KJM-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND JOSHUA J. TANTON, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through appointed pro bono counsel in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s second amended complaint filed by counsel on April 15, 2019 alleging Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claims against defendants Becerra, Halloran, Largent, Valencia, Martin, Kenton, and Herrera; Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against defendants Tanton, Hammer, Pierce, Rashev, Stanfield, Leech and Manson; and an Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against defendant Ellin. See ECF No. 43. After discovery was bifurcated on the issue of plaintiff’s exhaustion of his administrative remedies, the parties filed cross summary judgment motions. ECF Nos. 106, 107. After full briefing on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.