(PS) Ringgold v. Burgett Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD RINGGOLD, No. 2:22-cv-00836-DAD-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND BURGETT, INC., doing business as

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

PIANODISC, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff proceeds pro se with claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and state law claims. This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Defendants’ motion to dismiss filed on September 15, 2022 (ECF No. 9) is before the court. Plaintiff opposes the motion. Having considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the undersigned finds oral argument to be unnecessary. Accordingly, the hearing scheduled for October 26, 2022 will be vacated. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will recommend the motion to dismiss be denied without prejudice and that the court grant plaintiff an extension of time to effectuate proper service of the summons and complaint on the…