Schaupp

Schaupp v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20221:22-cv-00849California944 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAROLYN SCHAUPP, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-00849-JLT-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDERS

v. AND FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., ORDER DENYING REMAINING

MATTERS AS MOOT

Defendants. (Docs. 3, 4, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15) 16 Carolyn Schaupp, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in this action on behalf of herself and minors L.S., D.S., P.I., and J.B. on July 11, 2022. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff did not file a petition to appear guardian ad litem on behalf of minors L.S., D.S., P.I., and J.B., nor did she pay the filing fee, but instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. 2.) Concurrently with the complaint and IFP application, Plaintiff filed a motion to appoint counsel and motion for permission for electronic case filing, both of which remain pending. (Docs. 3, 4.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.