Hicks

(PC) Washington v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20221:19-cv-00156California480 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 1:19-cv-00156-JLT-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING IMPERMISSIBLE

SURREPLY

vs. (ECF No. 143.) HICKS, et al.,

Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 I. BACKGROUND Tracye Benard Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Complaint filed on February 5, 2019, against defendant Sergeant David Hicks (“Defendant”) for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) On August 31, 2022, Defendant Hicks filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 132.) On September 20, 2022, Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 137.) On October 3, 2022, Defendant filed a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition. (ECF No. 141.) On October 13, 2022, Plaintiff filed a reply to Defendant’s reply to the opposition. (ECF No. 143.) The court construes Plaintiff’s reply as an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.