(SS) Quesada v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20221:20-cv-01674California7,164 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESUS QUESADA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01674-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

SECURITY APPEAL

v. (ECF Nos. 16, 17, 18) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Jesus Quesada (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Plaintiff argues that: (1) the ALJ erred in the evaluation of Dr. Hoffman’s medical opinion; and (2) the ALJ erred in evaluating and disregarding Plaintiff’s testimony. (ECF No. 16.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Social Security appeal shall be granted. / / / / / / II. BACKGROUND 3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.