(PS) Halousek v. Sacramento County Sheriff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHEILA HALOUSEK, No. 2:21-cv-2351 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

OFFICE AND THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Sheila Halousek is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s amended complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 4.) Therein, plaintiff complains about the threatened towing of plaintiff’s vehicle. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s amended complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s amended complaint will be dismissed with leave to amend. //// ////…