Dahlin
Dahlin v. Frieborn
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES DAHLIN and KIMBERLY No. 2:17-cv-02585-MCE-AC
DAHLIN,
12 Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v.
ROSEMARY FRIEBORN, CURT
RANSOM, DEBBIE NELSON, PHILLIP
ISETTA, ANGELA MCCULLOUGH,
TUCKER HUEY, and THOMAS
SHERIFF,
17 Defendants. 18 Through the present action, Plaintiffs James and Kimberly Dahlin (“Plaintiffs”) assert eight federal and state causes of action against various municipal and non- municipal Defendants stemming from the seizure of various items and 57 dogs from Plaintiffs’ property, where they own and operate a dog breeding business. Third Am. Compl., ECF No. 149 (“TAC”). Presently before the Court are two individually briefed
25 1 The TAC does not include the following parties who were listed in former complaints: (1) Plaintiff Toby Tippets, (2) Plaintiff Martina Tippets, (3) Defendant Marilyn Jasper, (4) Defendant Cassie Reeves, (5) Defendant Katie Newman, (6) Defendant Sherry Couzens, (7) Defendant Humane Society of the Sierra 26 Foothills, (8)…