Montiez
(PC) Littleton v. Montiez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LITTLETON, No. 2:22-cv-0700 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARK MONTIEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. On June 17, 2022, plaintiff’s third amended complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint on the court’s form that complies with the June 3, 2022 order. Since that date, plaintiff has filed two more putative amended complaints. However, because plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint suffers the same defects as his third amended complaint, and is now superseded by his fifth amended complaint, the court will screen his fifth amended complaint (ECF No. 25). As discussed below, plaintiff’s pleading is dismissed with one last opportunity to amend. Screening Standards The…