(HC) Klein v. Shasta County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20222:22-cv-00776California575 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL STEPHEN KLEIN, No. 2:22-cv-00776-TLN-DMC Petitioner,

ORDER

v. SHASTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a pre-trial detainee proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On July 25, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. (ECF No. 7.) No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. Although it appears from the file that Petitioner’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, Petitioner was properly served. It is Petitioner’s responsibility to keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.