Mendoza

(PC) Venegas v. Mendoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20221:21-cv-00962California870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SALVADOR VENEGAS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00962-ADA-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR

v. FAILURE TO FOLLOW A COURT ORDER 13 MENDOZA, et al., ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO

RESPOND

14 Defendants. RESPONSE DUE WITHIN SEVEN DAYS

16 17 On August 30, 2022, the Court received in camera documents from Defendants. (See ECF 18 No. 58). Defendants state that the documents were withheld from Defendant Mendoza’s response 19 to Plaintiff’s Request for Production of Documents, Set One. (Id. at 2). Defendants indicated that 20 they objected to some of the requests on the basis of the official information privilege. (Id.) 21 According to Defendants, the withheld documents were submitted for in camera review to the 22 Court in compliance with the Court’s scheduling order. (Id.)1 23 The Court writes now because it appears that such documents should have either been 24 produced to Plaintiff or formally objected to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.