McQuennie

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 STEPHEN MCQUENNIE, Case No. 1:22-cv-00557-JLT-SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v. FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S

WELLS FARGO INSTITUTIONAL ORDER RETIREMENT SERVICES, et. al., (Doc. 6) Defendants. TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

15 16 On May 10, 2022, Plaintiff Stephen McQuennie (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed an action against Defendants Wells Fargo Institutional Retirement Services and Principal Financial Group. (Doc. 1.) On August 12, 2022, the undersigned issued a screening order finding that Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims and advised him that he had two options as to how to proceed: Plaintiff could file either (1) an amended complaint within thirty days, which would be screened in due course; or (2) a statement that he wished to stand on the initial complaint and…