Edwards

(PC) Mayes v. Edwards

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20222:19-cv-02236California303 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEDVIENO D’BARGE MAYES, No. 2:19-cv-2236 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND M. EDWARDS, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 On August 15, 2022, this court directed plaintiff to file a pretrial statement on or before October 3, 2022. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. The court will therefore recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants are relieved from filing a pretrial statement; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.