Hernandez

Hernandez v. Washburn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20221:22-cv-00092California5,798 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ADAN HERNANDEZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-00092-JLT-SAB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSING v. COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND DISMISSING ACTION FOR

M. WASHBURN, et al., FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT

ORDERS AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendants. (ECF Nos. 14, 15, 18)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 I. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND Adan Hernandez (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action on January 21, 2022, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 11, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s initially filed complaint, found Plaintiff failed to state a claim, and granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.