Baday

Baday v. County of Kings

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 18, 20221:20-cv-00644California11,346 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KARLA BADAY, No. 1:20-cv-00644-ADA-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND

DENYING, IN PART, DEFENDANTS’

v. AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) KINGS COUNTY, et al., (ECF No. 19) Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND

THE COMPLAINT WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS 17 I. Procedural Background On May 6, 2020, Plaintiff filed a complaint asserting six causes of action against two groups of defendants: (1) Kings County and certain county officials (hereinafter “County Defendants”), and (2) Adventist Health Hanford and Georganne Greene, a nurse who works at Adventist Health (hereinafter “Health Defendants”). (ECF No. 1.) On July 20, 2020, County Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the claims against them. (ECF No. 14.) Health Defendants filed their own amended motion to dismiss on August 4,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.