(PC) Iseli v. State of CA (CDCR)

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20222:22-cv-01792California3,258 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDEN WILLIE ISELI, No. 2:22-cv-1792 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). As discussed below, plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Screening Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner raised claims that are legally //// 26 Because the court is unable to discern the nature of plaintiff’s claims, plaintiff’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is deferred pending…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.