Palleres

(HC) Gosztyla v. Palleres

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20222:22-cv-00900California279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHANTELL GOSZTYLA, No. 2:22-cv-0900 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER PALLERES, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 11, 2022, petitioner filed a putative second addendum to the federal habeas petition claiming she has exhausted all state court remedies, and seeks appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 8.) In light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the court has determined that the interests of justice require appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 8) is granted. 2. The Federal Defender is appointed to represent petitioner. 3. Petitioner’s counsel shall contact the Clerk’s Office…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.