(PC) Smith v. Municipality of Fresno County

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY PAUL SMITH, No. 2:21-cv-1992 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

MUNICIPALITY OF FRESNO COUNTY, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff has submitted a letter requesting that the court rule on his motions and requesting that he be appointed counsel. ECF No. 116. Another letter has been docketed as a motion for deposition; it contains letter that contains a “second request for production of documents” as well as a “subvertive motion for deposition.” ECF No. 117. Most recently, plaintiff has filed a motion for the disqualification of judges. ECF No. 118. For the reasons stated below, these various requests and motions will be denied. ////

These motions are rambling and largely unintelligible. Plaintiff appears to raise numerous issues that are unrelated to the relief requested in his captions. Plaintiff has previously been told that discrete requests for relief must be presented as separate…