Pleshchuck

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TEVIN LEE HARRIS, No. 2: 19-cv-1751 DAD KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. VALENCIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to compel, plaintiff’s motion for the court to rule on defendant’s motion to compel and plaintiff’s request for a settlement conference or trial scheduling. (ECF Nos. 107, 114, 120.) For the reasons stated herein, defendant’s motion to compel is granted and plaintiff’s pending motions are denied. Plaintiff’s Claims The only defendant in this action is R. Pleshchuck. Plaintiff alleges that defendant Pleshchuck violated the Eight Amendment by denying plaintiff adequate mental health care when plaintiff was housed at California State Prison-Sacramento (“CSP-Sac”) during 2018. //// 28 Legal Standard for Motion to Compel The scope of…