Beard

Beard v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20221:21-cv-00841California6,480 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHANE BEARD, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00841-ADA-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX

PARTE MOTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS

v. ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF; PERMISSION

TO FILE MOTION FOR

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., CONTEMPT/SANCTIONS FOLLOWING

CLOSE OF FACT DISCOVERY

Defendants.

ORDER VACATING NOVEMBER 16, 2022

HEARING

(ECF No. 47)

19 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Shane Beard, Hilda Perez, and N.P.’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) initiated this action on May 24, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ “Ex Parte Motion for Miscellaneous Administrative Relief; Permission to File Motion for Contempt/Sanctions Following Close of Fact Discovery.” (ECF No. 47 (caption capitalizations removed).) For the reasons discussed herein, Plaintiffs’ ex parte motion shall be denied without prejudice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.