Dozier

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN MICHAEL BUTLER, No. 2:22-cv-0226 DAD DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER LACHELLE DOZIER, et al., Defendants, 16 Plaintiff Kevin Michael Butler is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order signed April 18, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was granted twenty-eight days from the date of that order to file the amended complaint and was specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner could result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 7.) The twenty-eight-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed…