Barajas
(PC) Hernandez v. Barajas
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JUAN HERNANDEZ, No. 2:21-cv-0480 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOHN DOE, #1, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s order granting defendants’ motion to opt out of the post-screening ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Project. (ECF No. 30.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will recommend that plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration be denied. I. Plaintiff’s Motion Plaintiff argues that the court should reconsider its decision to grant defendants’ motion to opt out. (ECF No. 30.) In support of his argument, he states that he declined to speak to counsel for defendants because prison officials would not allow him to have a…