Baughman

(HC) Jones v. Baughman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20222:21-cv-02241California2,556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANNY JONES, No. 2:21-cv-2241 TLN KJN P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS DAVID BAUGHMAN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges a November 16, 2016 prison disciplinary decision finding him guilty of conspiracy to introduce a controlled substance. Petitioner seeks reversal and expungement of the disciplinary decision, claiming he was denied due process at the disciplinary hearing. Presently before the court is respondent’s fully-briefed motion to dismiss the petition as untimely. For the reasons set forth below, it is recommended that the motion be granted. State Court Proceedings On April 1, 2016, petitioner was charged with conspiracy to introduce a controlled substance. (ECF No. 1 at 30.) Petitioner appeared before a senior hearing officer on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.