(HC)Gulbronson

(HC)Gulbronson v. Horn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20222:22-cv-01335California961 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC CONRAD GULBRONSON, No. 2:22-cv-1335 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

P. HORN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I. The Petition Although petitioner’s pleading is styled as a § 2254 petition, he does not challenge his sentence or conviction. Instead, petitioner alleges that his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when he was placed in a management cell for twenty-one days in retaliation for unspecified conduct and his personal property was stolen. EFC No. 1 at 3-4. A petitioner may seek federal habeas relief from a state court judgment “only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). In order for the court to have habeas jurisdiction over petitioner’s claims, success on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.