Amezcua
(PC) Fairchild-Littlefield v. Amezcua
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20221:20-cv-00799California451 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GIGI FAIRCHILD-LITTLEFIELD, 1:20-cv-00799-JLT-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-
vs. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT
AMEZCUA’S MOTION TO DISMISS
R. AMEZCUA, et al., WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
Defendants. (ECF No. 39.)
17 On September 22, 2022, defendant Amezcua (“Defendant”) filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 39.) Plaintiff Gigi Fairchild-Littlefield was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l). Local Rule 230(l) provides that the failure to oppose a motion “may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . .” The court may deem any failure to oppose Defendant’s motion to dismiss as a waiver and thereafter recommend that the motion be granted on that basis. Further, failure to follow a district court’s local rules is a proper grounds for…