Parriot

(PC) Smith v. Parriot

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20221:19-cv-00286California1,508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH, 1:19-cv-00286-JLT-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

vs. MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL FACT

FINDINGS BE DENIED

PARRIOT, et al., (ECF No. 71.) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

17 18 19 20 I. BACKGROUND Lawrence Christopher Smith (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 2, 2022, the Court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to exhaust remedies and as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). (ECF No. 69.) Judgment was entered on September 2, 2022. (ECF No. 70.) On September 23, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion titled “Motion for Additional Fact Findings Per Rule 59 Fed. R. Civ. P.” (ECF No. 71.) The motion is unopposed. 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.