Parriot
(PC) Smith v. Parriot
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH, 1:19-cv-00286-JLT-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
vs. MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL FACT
FINDINGS BE DENIED
PARRIOT, et al., (ECF No. 71.) Defendants.
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS
17 18 19 20 I. BACKGROUND Lawrence Christopher Smith (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 2, 2022, the Court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to exhaust remedies and as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). (ECF No. 69.) Judgment was entered on September 2, 2022. (ECF No. 70.) On September 23, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion titled “Motion for Additional Fact Findings Per Rule 59 Fed. R. Civ. P.” (ECF No. 71.) The motion is unopposed. 1 …