Bravdrick

(PC) Correa v. Bravdrick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20221:19-cv-00369California1,701 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGELO CORREA, No. 1:19-cv-00369-ADA-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S DENIAL OF PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL, MOTION TO COMPEL, AND

BRAUDRICK, et al., MOTION FOR STAY

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 94, 95, 97)

16 Plaintiff Angelo Correa is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 25, 2022, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued an Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay. (ECF No. 91.) On August 26, 2022, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued an Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel, (ECF No. 93), and an Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 92). On September 26, 2022, Plaintiff filed “Plaintiff’s Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel” and “Plaintiff’s Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.