Ramirez

Ramirez v. Finestaine

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20221:22-cv-01343California2,678 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 Case No. 1:22-cv-01343-ADA-SKO

ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ,

ORDER TO PAY FILING FEE OR FILE

Plaintiff, APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND

v. 12 (Doc. 1)

DIANNA FINESTAINE,

Defendant.

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff, Israel Maldonado Ramirez, a state prisoner, filed this action on the form for claims brought under 28 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff’s allegations are largely unintelligible, although he refers to both “deliberate indifference” and “habeas corpus.” (See Doc. 1 at 5, 6.) It is therefore difficult to discern whether Plaintiff wishes to pursue this as a habeas petition or as a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is provided the form complaints for both types of actions, leave to file an amended complaint on the form that corresponds with the action he intends to pursue here, and information pertaining to the differences in filing fees between each type of action. Should…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.