1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CASEY D. CHAVEZ-REYES, Case No. 1:22-cv-00089-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’

STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND

13 v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND 14 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING REMANDING CASE1

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

15 SECURITY, (Doc. No. 15) 16 Defendant. ORDER MOOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

17 (Doc. No. 11) 18 19 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed October 21, 2022. 20 (Doc. No. 15). Plaintiff Casey D. Chavez-Reyes and the Commissioner of Social Security agree 21 that this case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 22 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.). 23 The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in 24 conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. 25 See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991) (addressing issue of attorney’s fees under 26 1 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 27 §636(c)(1). (Doc. No. 8).

28 1 | the Equal Access to Justice Act and calculating deadline using date of final judgment). The 2 | Melkonyan court recognized 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) contemplates only two types of remand — 3 | sentence four or sentence six. Jd. at 98. A sentence four remand authorizes a court to enter “a 4 | judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Secretary, with or without 5 || resetting the cause for a rehearing.” Jd. (other citations omitted). 6 The Court grants the parties’ motion to remand under sentence four and reverses the 7 | Commissioner’s final decision. As agreed upon by the parties, upon remand, the Administrative 8 || Law Judge should re-evaluate the evidence of record and issue a new decision. 9 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 10 1. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C.§ 405(g), the Court grants the joint motion to 11 | remand (Doc. No. 15) and REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision. This case is REMANDED 12 | to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with this Order. 13 2. An application for attorney fees may be filed by separate motion. 14 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 11) is MOOT. 15 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff, terminate any deadlines, and close 16 || this case. '7 | Dated: _ October 24, 2022 Mihaw. Wh. foareh Zaskth 18 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28