Gipson
(PC) Michel v. Gipson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FABIAN HANCY MICHEL, No. 21-cv-2178 WBS KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONNIE GIPSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On February 15, 2022, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was granted leave to file a second amended complaint that challenges one disciplinary proceeding that took place at Mule Creek State Prison. (EF No. 14 at 8.) Following multiple extensions of time, plaintiff’s second amended complaint is now before the court. As discussed below, the undersigned recommends that plaintiff’s second amended complaint be dismissed without leave to amend, and this action be dismissed. Screening Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion…