(PS) Auten v. County of Calaveras

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20221:20-cv-00329California464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONALD AUTEN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00329-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, (ECF No. 57) Defendant.

16 Plaintiff Donald Auten, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). On October 20, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the appointment of counsel, stating that he has “made a diligent effort to obtain the assistance of counsel and employ counsel” and has “attended Pro Se Help Programs” and has 20 worked diligently in litigating this case. (ECF No. 57, p. 1). 21 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), the Court may request that an attorney represent an 22 indigent party in a civil case. However, the appointment of counsel is not a constitutional right, 23 and the Court cannot require an attorney to represent a party. See Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 24 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), withdrawn in part on other grounds, 154 F.3d 952…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.