Brown

Brown v. Zymey Industries

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20221:22-cv-00712California720 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY JAMES BROWN, Case No. 1:22-cv-00712-AWI-SKO

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

v. T CO O MDI PS LM YI WSS I F TO HR T F HA EI CLU OR UE R TT ’O S ORDERS AND FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

ZYMEY INDUSTRIES, et al., (Docs. 5 & 6) Defendants.

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

15 _____________________________________/ 16 Plaintiff Jeremy James Brown is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 14, 2022. (Doc. 1). On August 2, 2022, the Court issued an order finding that Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state any cognizable claims and granting leave for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (Doc. 5.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or requested an extension of time in which to do so. On September 16, 2022, an order issued for Plaintiff to show cause (“OSC”) within thirty days why the action should not be dismissed for his failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.