(PS) Anenson v. Vacaville Unified School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN ANENSON, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00901-MCE-DB Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER VACAVILLE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff Ryan Anenson (“Ryan” or “Student”) and his parents Sarah and Christian 18 Anenson (individually “Sarah” and “Christian” and together the “Parents”) (collectively, 19 “Plaintiffs”) originally brought claims against Defendants Vacaville Unified School District 20 (“VUSD”), Dixon Unified School District (“DUSD”), Solano County Special Education 21 Local Plan Area (“SELPA”), and Solano County Office of Education (“SCOE”) based on 22 an alleged abridgement of the Student’s educational rights and unlawful retaliation 23 against Plaintiffs while the Student was attending Vacaville High School and Dixon High 24 School. More specifically, Plaintiffs set forth claims under § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act 25 (“Section 504”), 29 U.S.C. § 794, the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. 26 §§ 12131 et seq., California’s Unruh Civil…