Jones

(PC) Mills v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20221:21-cv-01193California803 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS K. MILLS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01193-ADA-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS

TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

v. (Doc. Nos. 121, 127) Z. JONES, et al., Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions to compel Defendants to answer interrogatories filed on July 29, 2022 and August 3, 2022, respectively. (Doc. Nos. 121, 127). Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se on his First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 7). Defendants filed an omnibus response addressing the motions subject to this order, as well as other motions filed by Plaintiff, on September 14, 2022. (Doc. No. 137). The Court denies Plaintiff’s motions. In Plaintiff’s July 29 one-page motion, he requests the Court to order Defendants to answer, “set one” and “set two” of his “interrogatory questions.” (Doc. No. 121 at 2). Plaintiff explains that while Defendants objected to the questions, he believes they need to answer each 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.