Watrous

(PC) Richson-Bey v. Watrous

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20221:21-cv-01482California6,778 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEAN J. RICHSON-BEY, 1:21-cv-01482-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER

vs. ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

WATROUS, et al., CLAIM, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 15.) Defendants

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS TO SUPPLEMENT THE

COMPLAINT

(ECF Nos. 14, 16.)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE A

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

20 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Sean J. Richson-Bey, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on October 5, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On May 16, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to file supplemental pleadings pursuant to Rule 15(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 14.) On June 13, 2022, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint as a matter of course. (ECF No. 15.) On June 21, 2022,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.