Torres

(PC) Howell v. Torres

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20222:22-cv-00893California317 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM J. HOWELL, No. 2: 22-cv-0893 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND TORES, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 By an order dated July 29, 2022, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this case. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.